Unemployment Insurance Modernization
  • Introduction
  • What we're reading
    • Language Access Resources
    • Tracking implemented solutions
  • Language Access Resources
    • USDR Language Access Support
    • AI Translation Assistants for Unemployment Insurance Benefits
    • Spanish Translation Guide for Unemployment Insurance
      • Using This Guide
      • Writing Inclusive Spanish
      • Writing Plain Spanish
        • Guidance For Word Choice
        • Guidance For Sentence Structure
        • Spanish Grammar Conventions
      • Designing Reader-Friendly Content for Spanish Speakers
      • Final Notes
      • USDR Language Access Support
      • Links to Resources
      • Spanish Translation Guide Changelog
  • Plain Spanish Glossary of Unemployment Insurance Terms
  • Multilingual Retroactive PUA Eligibility Resources for State Workforce Agencies
    • (English) Retroactive PUA – Claimant Communications
    • (Spanish) Retroactive PUA – Claimant Communications
    • (English) Retroactive PUA – Fact-finding content
    • (Spanish) Retroactive PUA – Fact-finding content
    • Retroactive PUA – Fact-finding form design
  • Unemployment Insurance Fraud Reporting
    • Unemployment Insurance Fraud Reporting Tool Kit
  • Identity proofing for UI agencies
    • Identity proofing introduction
    • Race and inequity in identity proofing methods
      • Background
      • Recommendation 1: Find and mitigate inequitable impact of identity fraud detection flags
      • Recommendation 2: Increase accountability for ensuring rightful claimants make it through the system
      • References and thanks
    • What is identity proofing?
    • Commercial uses of identity proofing
    • Process of identity proofing
      • Identity resolution
      • Identity validation
      • Identity verification
    • User experience of identity proofing
    • Identity proofing vendor comparison
      • Vendor analysis
      • Summary of vendor offerings
      • Deep dive: pricing
      • Deep dive: platform “bundling”
      • Deep dive: handling Social Security numbers
      • Deep dive: document verification
      • What’s next?
    • Appendix I: Vendor evaluation of key considerations
    • Appendix II: Vendor Evaluation of Supplemental Considerations
  • Additional Deep Dives
    • Effective Communication with UI Claimants Through a Standalone Case Management System
    • Sample Communications
    • Customer support mechanisms for UI agencies
      • Improved UX reduces inequity
      • Online appointment scheduling
        • Agency’s current solution
        • Other states’ solutions
        • Solution space
        • Deep dive: vendor “types”
        • Deep dive: pricing
        • Recommendations by category
      • Chatbots
        • Methodology
        • Types of online chat
        • Live chat
        • Free-text chat
        • Prompted chat
        • Support chat
        • Requirements
        • Best practices
        • Known results
    • Employer Interactions with Unemployment Insurance Systems
      • Landscape of the Employer Experience: User Interviews
        • Methodology
        • Key Takeaways
      • Employer Experience: Digital Interactions
        • Methodology & Note on Language
        • Key Takeaways
  • UI Journey Map & Recommendations
    • Introduction
      • The Journey Map
      • Methods & Acknowledgements
    • The Claimant Journey
      • Know what I'm eligible for
      • Submit my information
      • Certify Weekly
      • Receive Payment
      • Know my claim status
      • Receive Help
    • The Agency Journey
      • Validate Identity
      • Validate Monetary Eligibility
      • Interacting with Employers
      • Fact Finding
      • Update systems for new programs
      • Relationship with US DOL
    • The Employer Journey
  • Getting started with data
Powered by GitBook
On this page

Was this helpful?

Export as PDF
  1. Additional Deep Dives
  2. Customer support mechanisms for UI agencies
  3. Online appointment scheduling

Deep dive: vendor “types”

The evaluated vendors fall into three main categories, only one of which feels like a good match for the state UI agency's scenario: “General Appointment Scheduling,” which is also referred to as “Candidate” to reflect that match.

  1. Healthcare appointment scheduling: These ones tend to have rich feature sets and good UX for the actual scheduling mechanics -- but are not as applicable in other ways that the agency would need. E.g., they may have only medical-specific intake forms (like uploading insurance information), or they don’t have integrations with CRMs (instead integrating with Electronic Health Record management systems). Several of them were also more focused on queue management than the actual scheduling of appointments.

  2. Small service-sector business appointments: These vendors are targeting small businesses with a handful of employees for 1-1 or group appointments usually with a SPECIFIC individual. They also tend to offer a number of things that the agency wouldn’t use (like social media integration, payments integration, and marketing features), contributing to a higher price point than some of the other offerings.

  3. General appointment scheduling: These vendors are targeting organizations or even individuals across sectors. Their systems are generic enough to be useful in a lot of scenarios, including the UI agency's, and so in this paper are referred to as “Candidates.” Some of these vendors have solutions targeting state Departments of Motor Vehicles or the equivalent, which is a useful comparison scenario for these purposes.

PreviousSolution spaceNextDeep dive: pricing

Last updated 4 years ago

Was this helpful?